TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Wed May 27, 2009 11:47 am

H3WM Pennywise wrote:
Can't tell if you're being serious or not lol.

Noes i are sarcasms!

Wed May 27, 2009 12:05 pm

I would say that it is just about ready to be put up on Bungie!

Wed May 27, 2009 12:10 pm

H3WM Psyfireman wrote:
I would say that it is just about ready to be put up on Bungie!

We could use it in another "H3WM" montage but we need to add more meat to the bones as its a bit bare just by its self.

Wed May 27, 2009 1:25 pm

If you make a montage i would say go for more exciting things rather than massive sprees because although they are awesome in medal form they are not as fun to watch

Wed May 27, 2009 2:07 pm

well done, in the olden days i would probably have heard about this alot earlier than now...

Congratulations buddy

Wed May 27, 2009 3:43 pm

You should definitely submit it to the Top ten Warthog kills... there's a thread about it somewhere... I won't be submitting mine, yours is better anyway...

Thu May 28, 2009 9:46 pm

Congrats but I have to say it:

Matchmaking Fail...

I'm not trying to be mean as I know I couldn't accomplish your feat if I tried but I feel bad for those poor folks.

This is why I try to get people to play Ranked as (although its far from perfect) it takes ranks and # of teammates into account much more than social big team. Beating up on Lt.s and their 3 guests is not cool.
:shrug:

IMO.

Fri May 29, 2009 6:56 am

Luv Gunn wrote:
Congrats but I have to say it:

Matchmaking Fail...

I'm not trying to be mean as I know I couldn't accomplish your feat if I tried but I feel bad for those poor folks.

This is why I try to get people to play Ranked as (although its far from perfect) it takes ranks and # of teammates into account much more than social big team. Beating up on Lt.s and their 3 guests is not cool.

IMO.

While I will agree that it is a MM fail. I will also state that Social also uses ranks (and TruSkill) to determine matches. They actually all had fairly high playlist ranks. Not Generals but Commander and Colonel levels in playlist. Which leads me to believe that some players do not mind getting beat up like that in BTB, otherwise they would not play it as much or would have quit out of that match.

I find it funny that we claim MM fail whenever we face Commanders and below, but we never claim the same thing when we get matched up against 8 Generals and we are all Commanders/Colonels with a few Brigs.

As far as Ranked over Social is concerned, I've played dozens of Ranked games where it ended up the same way. I go into a playlist where I'm a 12 or so and all I face is Lt's and Capt's. Would you say it's a MM fail there, no because you have that little number over there that tells you that you won't be playing them for much longer. What people fail to see is that Social uses the same system, you just can't see it. So while you do get MM fail matches once in a while, you get matches you should get most of the time, just like Ranked.

Fri May 29, 2009 11:00 am

Nice game guys on both parts. Way to turn up the heat. Also a good job to the guys preventing some disastrous endings to their run.

Sat May 30, 2009 10:01 am

Thanks boys, did you submit this to the top ten warthog kills starbucks? I actually think we might make it on.

Sat May 30, 2009 10:53 am

H3WM TsengMao wrote:
Luv Gunn wrote:
Congrats but I have to say it:

Matchmaking Fail...

I'm not trying to be mean as I know I couldn't accomplish your feat if I tried but I feel bad for those poor folks.

This is why I try to get people to play Ranked as (although its far from perfect) it takes ranks and # of teammates into account much more than social big team. Beating up on Lt.s and their 3 guests is not cool.

IMO.

While I will agree that it is a MM fail. I will also state that Social also uses ranks (and TruSkill) to determine matches. They actually all had fairly high playlist ranks. Not Generals but Commander and Colonel levels in playlist. Which leads me to believe that some players do not mind getting beat up like that in BTB, otherwise they would not play it as much or would have quit out of that match.

I find it funny that we claim MM fail whenever we face Commanders and below, but we never claim the same thing when we get matched up against 8 Generals and we are all Commanders/Colonels with a few Brigs.

As far as Ranked over Social is concerned, I've played dozens of Ranked games where it ended up the same way. I go into a playlist where I'm a 12 or so and all I face is Lt's and Capt's. Would you say it's a MM fail there, no because you have that little number over there that tells you that you won't be playing them for much longer. What people fail to see is that Social uses the same system, you just can't see it. So while you do get MM fail matches once in a while, you get matches you should get most of the time, just like Ranked.

This is considered a MM fail no matter how you look at it

Website · Sat May 30, 2009 11:30 am

H3WM Darkarchon wrote:
[url=http://www.bungie.net/Stats/GameStatsHalo3.aspx?gameid=1157630297&player=H3WM Darkarchon]This is considered a MM fail no matter how you look at it.

This is considered a link fail no matter how you look at it.

Sat May 30, 2009 1:01 pm

her her, ur funny. FIX'D

Sat May 30, 2009 6:12 pm

Cloudstrif677 wrote:
Thanks boys, did you submit this to the top ten warthog kills starbucks? I actually think we might make it on.

You should do it Cloud. As you actually have the better video. It always looks better from the Gunner view.

Sat May 30, 2009 6:44 pm

Just submitted it, I win.

TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Re: TRIPLE BLACKS!!

Who is online